Nick Hasell and Andrew Ellson
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Britain’s big banks face a major inquiry into current-account charges after the Office of Fair Trading said that it would extend the scope of its six-month investigation into overdraft fees to cover all aspects of retail bank pricing.
In a surprise announcement, the watchdog said that it was launching an “in-depth study” rather than implementing a “quick-fix solution”, and said it shares public concern about “the level and incidence” of current-account charges. The OFT will provide full details of the study next month and expects its inquiry to be completed by the end of the year.
The move served to head off speculation that the OFT would act swiftly to cap fees on current accounts — echoing its imposition of a £12 limit on credit card penalty fees last year — and effectively precipitate the end of free banking in the UK. At present, the charges and fees levied on customers who fall into the red subsidise the free banking received by the majority of customers.
John Fingleton, OFT chief executive, said: “The issue of bank current-account charges is a matter of real concern to the banks’ customers, and raises wider questions about competition and transparency of pricing. The initial scoping work we have undertaken has demonstrated to us that this is not only an issue for those people who are being charged, but also for customers who are not defaulting on their bank accounts.”
That statement implies that the OFT will now examine the payment of credit interest, the amount customers receive for keeping their current account in credit. Royal Bank of Scotland, which owns NatWest, Barclays and HSBC tend to pay interest substantially below base rates, often as low as 0.1 per cent, so that they are able to make big profits on their customers’ deposits. Other fees, such as for stopping a cheque, currently pitched at about £35, are also likely to be scrutinised.
David Black, head of banking at Defaqto, the research consultancy, said: “The banks are caught in something of a cross-fire at the moment. They are enjoying the proceeds of high overdraft fees and charges while also taking a hit by quietly refunding customers who complain. Any cap on charges from the OFT would hit their income going forward but would also set a limit on how much they have to refund.”
For banks the issue of default fees on current accounts is seen as of far greater concern than last year’s reduction of credit card fees because the sums involved are much greater.
“It will be imperative to listen to the public pronouncements of the major banks over the course of the next six months as they may seek to cut their charges in order to influence the OFT decision”, Mr Black said.
Which?, the consumer organisation, estimates that £3.5 billion will be paid in overdraft charges this year. Consumer groups argue that penalty fees — some as high as £39 — should only reflect a bank’s administration costs and not be used as a source of profit.
Joe Garner, head of personal financial services at HSBC, said: “Simply taking one aspect of service, such as charges, will not help banks serve the 21st century consumer properly.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
if the banks actions are illegal, why should i have to sue to get justice? they could find who they have "robbed" in seconds.......
Tim Blair, peterborough,
I have no objection to paying current account bank charges, (!), providing the bank pays a realistic return on all the money at present held on current accounts. I am paid 0.1%, which represents about £80 annually on the balance necessary to keep a working current account. I have never heard of any bank pointing out how profitable this is.
Brian Jones, Doncaster, UK
I agree with M Rigby of Chorley . Those of us and thats the majority, who keep to the agreed deal are just about to pay for those who don't. Why let the few who don't seem to give a toss about agreements spoil it for the prudent? Time for the majority to speak up I think. As for the jobsworths at the OFT... find something useful to do.
Guy Usabreck, Edinburgh, CO.
The key point: The banks are acting unlawfully with respect to the penalty charges they impose on current accounts. The banks have deliberately ignored the law and made illegal profits from their customers. Whether or not you judge those customers to be irresponsible is irrelevant!
If the banks are acting legally why are they refunding most customers who challenge them? The banks NEVER give the customer anything just because they feel sorry for them.
C Williams, Kingston, Surrey
Micheal
Such as the young woman with learning difficulties who believed someone had stolen her money so took out all her benefit (about £40) each week 'before someone else could steal it' and is now facing bank charges of over a thousand pounds.
Sasha Smith, Wolverhampton, west Mids
In my case, Nationwide Building Society refused to refund charges after letting through an unauthorised direct debit request from Lifeline Insurance, claiming it wasn't their fault I incurred charges. Even when they failed to check whether it was a valid and authorised request and also after failing to change my address details so I could keep an eye on the account.
In some cases I agree, that this is the reason for 'free' banking but when they're actually refusing to admit mistakes under that pretense, I get angry.
In fairness they will still make tons of money from implementing £5 charges!
In fairness I'd rather pay a £50 annual fee than be conned out of £200!!!
Diana, London,
The banks have been fleecing their customers for years. It amazes me the customers have put up with it so long. The government should have reined the banks in long ago. Now at last it seems something will be done.
Jon Flowers, Edinburgh, Scotland
Micheal, the truth of the matter is that a minority has been paying for your banking for a long time now. If one of my cheques bounce, how much does it cost the bank? Answer £1-£5 (the banks refuse to say). Yes, the gravy train's going to end - you're not going to be able to sponge off people in financial difficulty any more.
Don't try and claim you have a "right" to do so though.
david Spooner, London,
As happened with Credit Cards,all that will result from this farce is that the banks ,like the Credit Card companies,will pass on any reduction in their income onto profitable customers like me.Bad debtors have cost honest and prudent users a fortune in increased charges.
Why should we continually pay for idiots in the OFT proving a point which penalises the majority at the expense of a feckless minority?
Michael J Rigby, Chorley, Lancs, England