Carl Mortished, World Business Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

In a rushed display of Whitehall policymaking on the hoof, the Government tinkered with North Sea taxes yesterday and announced two small oilfield developments – a drop to fill the ocean that is Britain’s daily consumption of crude oil.
The changes to North Sea oil taxation were announced as the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer turned up at short notice in Aberdeen to attend a scheduled board meeting of Oil & Gas UK, an oil industry association.
The Prime Minister’s pressing concern about the tax burden suffered by North Sea oil companies came as a surprise to Britain’s oil industry, which has been lobbying the Government for years to scrap petroleum revenue tax (PRT).
“We didn’t know until this week that they wanted to come and discuss what could be done to maximise [oil] production,” an Oil & Gas UK spokesman said.
As Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling listened to the concerns of oil executives about taxes, high costs and regulation, the Department of Business hailed the Government’s plans for “increased North Sea oil production”. The department gave the go-ahead for two new oilfields, West Don and Don South West, which together would bring an extra 50,000 barrels per day ashore when the oil begins flowing next year.
In addition, the changes to the PRT regime would enable the investment that could add 20,000 barrels per day, the department said.
Good as it sounds, the extra oil will not arrest the steady decline in Britain’s oil and gas output, which averaged 2.8 million barrels per day (bpd) last year, down by about 100,000 barrels per day from 2006.
Britain’s hydrocarbon output has been in rapid decline since 2001 when it reached 4.2 million bpd, and the industry has had its wings clipped twice by tax increases introduced by Mr Brown in his previous role as Chancellor.
Yesterday the Government pointed to its decision to make minor adjustments to PRT that would carve out new oil and gasfields from existing fields, ensuring that the new developments would not be affected by the old tax.
PRT is an historic tax that was introduced in the early years of Britain’s oil boom, and now affects only mature North Sea oilfields. The industry has called for its complete abolition, arguing that it creates a disincentive for the additional investment needed to slow a declining production rate in oilfields that are approaching the end of their life.
High crude prices are stimulating more interest in oilfields that were once considered too small or too difficult to be economic. However, the cost of operating in the North Sea’s harsh environment has also soared.
The cost of construction and raw materials is rising and a scarcity of rigs capable of operating in deep waters has pushed rates to extraordinary levels, such that oil companies prefer to invest in more promising regions, such as West Africa.
The Department for Business also revealed that a recent licensing round had excited high levels of interest, with 193 applications covering 277 blocks. The response to the 25th licensing round was the highest since 1974, the year after the first Middle East oil crisis.
The Government said that it would offer 97 new licences in the 13th onshore round.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Publicly the PM is playing to the gallery and wants to be seen to be providing tax incentives to the oil companies to produce more oil in an attempt to reduce prices. Privately i think he is trying to exploit the high prices to maximise the tax take from NS Oil.
Jim Smitheman, Exeter, England
Wake up people! Tax or no tax, Oil prices are only going one way. Get used to it and adapt!
Lower you car use and get out of the SUVs.
Dan, London,
Is this correct, the government has increased duty/tax on fuel, to reduce the tax for oil producers who are raking in increased profits due to the price of oil? Are Brown and Darling looking for jobs in the oil industry in the near future?
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
The last minute gate crashing of a regular meeting of local industry execs and promoting it as a way to save our energy crisis is absolute rubbish. Economically the issue is the overall tax burden on fuel, security of our source and cost of supply. Gordon stop reading Enid Blyton and Listen
Wayne, Newcastle,
How can tax be "relaxed" without Parliament's approval?
Could other taxes be "relaxed" perhaps on the whim of the PM and Chancellor?
Surely this is a dangerous state of affairs and potentially open to a lot of abuse?
N Reed, Truro, UK
The Oil industry has manufactured the crisis for this very reason.
Of course the high fuel prices will only increase investment in alternatives.
I say leave it alone, the prices are high enough now so that the public are now changing behaviour, the very reason for the taxes in the first place.
Tony, Belfast,
Re Hauliers and fuel - Can a reading and enlightened accountant please tell me if the cost of fuel is directly offset as an operating cost (ie tax deductable) If this is so then the cost of fuel is more about cashflow than profits, and that is a very different argument
GG
Geriatric George, Lichfield,
The only way the government can cut fuel taxes and reduce the total tax take is to reduce spending. If the govenment was able to increase the efficiency of public services and had the guts to cut costs the way industry has had to over the last ten years there would be plenty of scope to cut taxes.
dave, blackburn, UK
It figures that the answer is to offer a tax break to the corporations rather than doing what we all know would cut the cost at the pumps - cut the fuel tax on all of us! Business needs the break. Us motorists have hardly noticed the cost of tax have we?
Rich, Falmouth, Cornwall
Considering it was Brown's own goal tax regime that has prevented exploitation of smaller fields to then call a hasty meeting nearly a decade on to relax controls and call it an initiative is a sick joke made even sicker by the fact that in global terms the increase amounts to a drop in the ocean.
philip, Ipswich,
I can't really see the problem.
Surely this is the opportunity to show everyone how green we really are. Let the moaning minnies get on their bikes and pedal!
John Rawlins, Valencia, Spain
Of course he'll cut tax for the Companies, he's raking it in off Joe public.
We are in effect subsidising the oil companies.
The only ones benfiting from this deal is the Government and the Oil Companies.
Phill, The Wirral, England
The Government have a nerve to go to oil companies for help when it is their own greed which has the British Hauliers struggling to keep the businesses going and the public not being able to afford to live. Everything comes on a lorry and the Government work for us, not the other way round.
Tony Barker, Holbeach, UK
What a Joke, this oil is sold under the free market, even Saudi Arabia could buy some if they wanted! Increasing production in the North Sea will have zero effect for British consumers unless the government introduces a protectionist policy of British oil for British people.
Adrian, Washington, ENGLAND
The oil companies are already making billions in profits - they don't need to be incentivised to make even more profits. What the electorate wants is a cut in fuel duty. We know that 70% of the price we are paying is tax - which goes straight to Gordon Brown to waste on failed social engineering.
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
Several years ago the hubristic Brown taxed the same companies on their "windfall" profits - they (oil companies) warned that such retrospective measures would lead to a decline in investment. Oh the chickens come home to roost! Brown is completely incompetent and he must go, now!
James, Mortain, France
Hands up all those who think Gordon is playing to the audience. Have you noticed he is involved in all good news stories. If that is all the spin doctors can come up with for there fees then its time to change them. We can all see right through it after 10 years. Please stop insulting us
Peter Mc, antwerp, belgium
Presumably this small concession from a Government in terminal decline requires this production to go to UK markets only! Otherwise it will not make a blind bit of difference. What has happened to Brown's championed global economy? Or are we like the French - pick and choose what we want.
William, London, UK
What a pathetic gesture by Brown and darling. It is red herring to con the electorate into believing they are able to solve the problem. Britains oil production is miniscule in comparrison to the big producers and is likely to stay this way for ever.
Mike O Connor, plymouth,
PRT was applied to old fields (pre-1993), many are now at low oil rates. Little incentive to invest in them for improvement, as you'd pay PRT tax. Better return on investment on new developments or outside of UK instead.
Abolishing PRT improves the economics of getting more out of old oil fields.
James, Aberdeen,
Does anyone think that if someone came up with a cheap alternative fuel tomorrow that cost 10p a gallon, these money-grabbing politicians wouldn't add some sort of tax to make the cost up to present levels? They don't want us to have the freedom to move around -- it's all about control.
Paul Downes, Milton Keynes, Bucks
This looks like a classic case of "being seen to do something" - sadly it won't make a blind bit of difference frankly to the big picture. Nice try Gordy. Postpone the 2p incease, and just lower duty even if its by a small amount..At the moment the Gov't is raking it in thanks to the oil price rises
tom, Loughborough,
The only fuel tax should be VAT. Any other tax just distorts the market.
Brian Gilbert, HAMPTON, Middx
Its no good Gordon & Co trying to boost output of a few thousand barrels when the real issue as everyone knows is the 'Tax Take' we all have to suffer when filling up. A 25p cut per litre in fuel tax at the very least is required. Does Gordon not realise he is adding to an inflationary recession?
Mike L, Manchester, UK
id doubt this will make it cheaper at the pumps
WAKE UP, time for a national fuel protest!!!!!
ivan, London, Europe
It's hardly going to make a difference to world oil prices.
Additional output might help Britain's trade balance which in turn will help to improve our exchange rate.
The best means of dealing with the oil shortage is to reduce consumption not trying to increase supply. Sounds like panic measures.
Paul Millsom, Worcester, UK
Stuart is right, the high oil price is incentive enough. Moreover, what is the government doing with this windfall of royalties?
paulo, coventry, uk
What we would like is a tax cut on petrol/diesel so the effect is at the pump and NOT for the oil companys.
WE want a tax cut so we can afford to get to work.
reduce tax to 70% and proplem solved over night ..........
dave , peterborough,
Surely the high oil price is incentive enough to invest in extracting oil? The only effect of giving the producers a tax rebate is to boost their profits at the exchequer's expense, and will have little impact on the price paid by consumers (either directly at the pump or indirectly in the shops).
Stuart, London,