Note: Some comments were written before the Bank’s statement on September 5 regarding plans to add liquidity to the market.

Sir Alan Budd

Former chief economic adviser to the Treasury and former Bank MPC member

HOLD

I have just come back from Jackson Hole with all the central bankers. I think there is enough uncertainty about credit markets to make it sensible to wait for at least a month to see how the effects may come through to the real economy. Even if this is mainly a US problem, we would not fully escape any developments there.

Claudio Costamagna

Former chairman of Goldman Sachs investment banking operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

HOLD

I would vote again for leaving the rate unchanged, given the overall situation of global financial markets, which is still quite uncertain and relatively fragile.

Bronwyn Curtis

Chair of the Society of Business Economists

HOLD

I have voted for “no change” but I would accompany this rate announcement with an explanatory statement giving some guidance on the potential impact to the real economy.

Higher money market rates and the widening in credit spreads is an effective tightening in monetary policy over and above the 1.25% rise in the Bank Rate that is still working through the economy. Even if the liquidity crunch is relatively short-lived, the widening in credit spreads and the re-pricing of risk is a longer term phenomenon. The net result is that borrowers will be paying more even with unchanged rates.

It is possible (although unlikely) that the impact is no more than the 6% Bank Rate expected by early 2008 before this round of turmoil, but the external environment has changed as well. Historically, periods of de-leveraging have had an adverse impact on the economy. Business investment and household consumption of durables have buoyed the UK economy. These are two of the most sensitive sectors to the cost of capital so, if confidence in the economy wanes, it could slow quite quickly.

Geoffrey Dicks

Chief UK economist, RBS Financial Markets

HOLD

The drop in CPI inflation to 1.9% in July is symptomatic of an underlying weakness on the consumer side of the economy that was already in place before the full effect of the MPC's monetary tightening had taken effect.

The turbulence in financial markets will result in tighter credit conditions even without any change in official rates. A case for cutting rates can be made but it is not quite firm yet. In the meantime there is absolutely no case for a rate hike.

Anatole Kaletsky

Chief economics commentator, The Times

HOLD

If interest rates were at the right level last month, then there should now be a bias towards easing, given the financial disruptions of the summer. This financial turmoil will potentially have more impact in Britain than in the US or Europe, because of the economy's depedence on a rapidly growing and highly profitable financial services industry.

Liquidity problems in Britain also seem to be substantially more severe than they are in the US or Europe. Throughout the past three weeks, spreads between three-month and overnight money have been much wider in London than in New York or Frankfurt . These spreads have imposed much higher interest rates on the real economy than the MPC envisaged at its last meeting. The persistent spread widening is also starting to damage the credibility of the British banking system and the reputation of London as a financial centre. The Bank of England needs to be more pro-active and pragmatic in dealing with the dislocations in London's money market.

Rupert Pennant-Rea

Former Deputy Governor of the Bank of England

HOLD

For better or worse, in the past couple of weeks the interbank market has produced some monetary tightening of its own. With so much uncertainty around, the MPC should stand back this month and leave its own rate alone. Only a genius or a fool can now be certain whether the next move in rates will be up or down.

The wider question is whether the Bank should be doing and saying more about the apparent silting-up of the short-term credit markets. In my view there is currently no systemic threat, so it is better to let the financial institutions sort themselves out. The Bank’s discount window is open, at a suitably penal rate: that is enough. The recent financial turmoil has come not from mistakes in official policy but from unwise lending. Those who make a mess should clear it up.

Sir Steve Robson

Former Second Permanent Secretary at the Treasury

HOLD

It would be inappropriate to move until we have a clearer view on how the combined impact of rate rises over the past year and the current financial volatility are affecting the economy. At present the UK economy seems to be robust but only part of past rate rises have so far fed through into mortgage payments and, in addition, the repricing of risk - if sustained - could affect borrowing by companies as well as individuals.

On the Bank, its performance to date has been far superior to that of the Fed or the ECB. The Bank has done exactly what it had said it would do - lend at its predetermined penal rate. Such predictability is really important at times like these. By comparison, the ECB appeared to panic and so added fuel to the flames while the Fed allowed itself to appear to be at the beck and call of politicians. Neither response is good for their credibility and credibility is at the heart of central banking.

I have doubts about any statement by the Bank on overnight lending. There is a risk - pace the ECB - of raising more questions than answers.

Sushil Wadhwani

Former member of the Bank’s MPC

HOLD

I would vote to leave the Bank rate unchanged this month, but with a view that the risks lie to the downside of my central projection for inflation because of the recent financial and credit market developments.

As I have said previously, the monetary tightening so far has probably been too great, with the full effects yet to come through. Inflation has already fallen by more than the MPC expected, and though month-to-month movements can be volatile, the difficulties in credit markets make it more likely that inflation will continue to surprise on the downside. Though the Fed's discount rate cut appears to have been associated with an equity rally, there are ongoing difficulties in the credit markets. The spreads between interbank LIBOR interest rates and Treasury Bill rates indicate continued distress and have tightened monetary conditions independently of Bank rate and the Asset Based Commercial Paper market still has very significant difficulties. The credit "bubble" that has grown over the past few years has probably burst and these things rarely occur painlessly.

Forecast-based policy needs to allow for the likely effect of the tightening in the price and availability of credit. In such circumstances, some of the hard economic data is "old news", and we need to focus on the most timely indicators. There are, however, considerable uncertainties about credit conditions, their impact, and the underlying strength of the economy. I would therefore wish to wait and see with respect to changes in Bank rate.

Martin Weale

Director, National Institute of Economic and Social Research

HOLD

I thought the July rise was unnecessary and the question is starting to arise whether it should be reversed. However it is hard to imagine that a quarter-point for a few months makes very much difference.

The Bank of England's conduct in the crisis has been exemplary. So far there is no evidence that non-financial businesses have been affected by it and it would not be right for the Bank to change policy unless they are. Banks are understandably reluctant to lend to each other but it is not clear that this should affect key retail lending with good security, for example on mortgages. Institutions which are short of retail funds may have difficulty in raising money but they should be displaced by institutions with excess funds which no longer want to risk their money in the inter-bank market and prefer to make loans with good security.

Today (5th September) the Bank has decided to increase liquidy to the system by providing extra credit at the Bank Rate rather than Bank Rate +1 %. However the extra credit is limited in volume and duration. It will provide help to institutions which are short of liquidity and by reducing the need to borrow at Bank Rate plus 1%, may avoid disruptive speculation about major problems at some Banks. The measure is likely to reduce pressure on 3-month rates.

If high inter-bank rates do start to permeate the "real" economy the case for a reversal of the July rise would be strengthened. But without this we should remember that the financial institutions affected by credit problems must have allowed for this sort of situation in their business planning. As with so many other businesses it is their skill which makes profits but someone else's fault when they make losses. The pressure for lower rates is best summed up by Mandy Rice-Davis's comment: "They would say that wouldn't they".

Times Recommends

• Lenders face huge hit on mortgage fraud
• Mortgage rescue fund at the ready
• Zoom airline collapses and halts all flights