David Budworth, Deputy Personal Finance Editor
Win VIP tickets
Millions of middle and higher earners will be hundreds of pounds a year worse off because of surprise changes to tax and national insurance.
Anyone earning more than £40,000 will pay more from 2011 because of a 0.5 per cent increase to national insurance. Those earning £150,000 or more – about 350,000 people - also face a new top rate of income tax of 45 per cent. A year before that, those with incomes of £100,000 or more will see a cut in the value of their personal allowance – the amount they earn before tax.
The small print also revealed that tens of thousands more people could be dragged into the higher-rate tax band from 2011. That is when the Chancellor plans to freeze the higher-rate threshold above which people pay 40 per cent tax, a move that accountants described as a classic “stealth tax”. The threshold usually rises in line with inflation each year.
Richard Mannion, of the accountant Smith & Williamson, said: “This is a set of Robin Hood initiatives, with income tax rises aimed at the better-off to enable giveaways to low-earning families.” The new 45 per cent rate has been widely mooted. Someone earning £200,000 will pay an extra £2,500 a year, he said.
The other measures came as a surprise, especially the changes to the personal allowance for high earners. From April 2010 the allowance will be reduced by £1 for every £2 by which income exceeds £100,000. Up to £140,000 it cannot be reduced by more than half, so if the personal allowance in 2010 is £6,475 it cannot drop below £3,240. For incomes above £140,000 the personal allowance is removed altogether.
Maurice Fitzpatrick, of the accountant Grant Thornton, said: “The proposal to withdraw the income tax personal allowance from people earning over £100,000 unleashes a barrage of somewhat arbitrary, and very high, marginal tax rates for higher earners. People earning £100,000, for example, will have a marginal income tax rate of 60 per cent.”
The measures combined mean that people earning £40,000 to £100,000 will, from 2011, be paying an average of £156 a year more in income tax and national insurance. Those earning £100,000 to £140,000 will pay £1,144 a year more, and with incomes of £140,000 to £200,000 will see their bill jump by an average £3,172 a year.
The news is better for many basic-rate taxpayers. In September Alistair Darling raised the annual personal allowance from £5,435 to £6,035 to repair damage caused by the withdrawal of the 10p tax band. The increase was introduced for the current tax year but the Chancellor announced yesterday that it will be permanent and he guaranteed an above-inflation increase in the allowance from April to £6,475.
Damage caused by the rise in national insurance in 2011 will be offset for lower earners by the starting point for national insurance being aligned with that of income tax.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Drop out of Europe and save us billions!
Mick Reilly, Doncaster,
The Institute of Fiscal Studies have just confirmed that, following an in depth review of the small print in fact all those above £20000 will be worse off and not the £40000 which was the government figure. Why can Brown never tell the truth with his budgets and all the bad news has to be found out
james, swindon, uk
I struggle to believe that there are only about 350,000 people that earn greater than £150k per annum. This does not correlate with the large number of high end properties in London and the South East alone, not accounting for the rest of the country.
Paul Tinker, Henley-on-Thames, UK
Good - it's about time Labour redistributed the cash. The wealth gap has been growing bigger and bigger over the past decade, the upper middle classes have never had it so good.
Although to be honest I'd prefer it if they went after the super rich.
Owen, London, UK
The labour tendency to load more taxes onto people earning 40K+ infuriates me. i earn 45K but I earn that by doing 12-14 hr days as a normal day, I study in the evenings and wends. There is a reason people who works 3-7 hours a day or less are lower income - they don't work as hard!
lainey, London,
This problem lies firmly at Gordon Brown's door. He did not see what was happening in 2006 and 2007 in the global market, he was too busy trying to oust the PM of the day. He can only deal with one thing at a time and thinks that's the economy, what else is he taking his eye off?
Susan James, Oxford, Uk
This is called income compression, the equalising of incomes between the rich and the poor. It worked very well in the US in the 50's, so may work in the UK now. Being a HR tax payer is not going to be much fun in the coming years, but the inequality of incomes needs to be re-balanced.
ipd, Tokyo, Japan
That's why ppl are leaving London. I worked in Tokyo last year and taxes are about 30%, but everything works - safe/clean, I was so sad to leave London, but after I moved to Tokyo, you realise that we get such a raw deal!! I'm working in Hong Kong now and the tax rate is 16%.
Sabrina, Hong Kong,
We pay so much tax and get so little - look at the NHS, state schools, linfrastructure, high cost transport, zealous bureaucracy & officialdom, health & safety.. bankrupt and saddled with massive debt. More tax = more waste = less productivity = less efficiency. Now we have a deadline to move away!
Sam Jones, London, UK
This story implies that the majority are being affected, This is not rue as only 10% earn more than £40,000. I am one of them and I am prepared to do my bit in difficult times. Many of thye posters here are simply greedy. We have had it good for long enough now we must provide the help to the nation
Craig, Glenorthes,
Change to Tax, Ni and VAT only mean anything if you work. Unemployment is the biggest issue facing a lot of us. The public sector is sheding jobs daily and wont be employing anyone. If the government agencies dont then who else will. Without a job these financial changes are worthless.
Jackie, Dagenham,
Change to Tax, Ni and VAT only mean anything if you work. Unemployment is the biggest issue facing a lot of us. The public sector is sheding jobs daily and wont be employing anyone. If the government agencies dont then who else will. Without a job these financial changes are worthless.
Jackie, Dagenham,
Good news, we're gonna tax the rich people to pay for the government spending........................hope some of them stay around to fulfill the obligation, and of course we can keep our jobs they create!
Paul, Milton Keynes, UK
Simple fact is once I hit £100k in fees I will stop taking on extra consultancy work. I've no intention of working when the majority (50% plus) of my earning goes straight to Brown
This will mean, lower tax take for Labour & a fall in economic activity from me
Time to work abroad I think
Guy, London, UK
The median income in the UK is about 25,000 pounds so 40,000 isn't really 'middle income'. If you are on 40,000 a year an extra 156 pounds isn't really going to be noticeable. If you earn in that range stop whining, there are a lot of people doing it tougher than you.
Glen, Melbourne ,
Taxing the £150,000+ crowd 5% more can destroy value in the economy. The £3,172 that the £140-200k earner loses likely would have been spent here, creating jobs and earning VAT on its transactions. This is a populist, election year budget not an economic one. £3,172 is not 'peanuts'.
C Bozner, London,
A few weeks ago I overheard a person in my gym saying that she has been unemployed on benefits for 9 months and had no intention of going back to work!
I have a university degree, a professional qualification and work hard. Why am I being taxed more to fund the lifestyle of people that are lazy?
Sam, Harrow, UK
"Labour has always been deeply jealous of the ~ £40K income group..."
Very true, CA. But inexplicable when you think how many Labour apparatchiks earn more than £100K themselves. I think you need to watch Rory Bremner (specifically the dinner party sketches) to understand how their minds work.
Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,
Why aren't Minsiters giving up their Final Salary pension schemes then aswell to relieve the burden of debt? Surely if I have to reduce my contributions to this now in order to pay more NI then they should make sacrifices too. Or would that be seen as unfair on them. Bring on an election
Paul, London, London
Ali, the immigrants have also helped to keep the cost of everything you buy low as well so in real terms chances are that until inflation started going up you were no worse off.
What really gets me is £60 for pensioners-is that all of them? Even the ones with a fair bit of money? Why?!
Richard Pickup, Wakefield, UK
The usual smoke and mirrors from the government - Gordon, people are not fools you know
malcolm, ely,
This is as fair as it can get. I have no qualms in paying my share of increased taxes with the hope that we all in the UK can get out of this economic turmoils in 1 piece. The government does their bit; we, the citizens, do our bit and when the UK is back to its former glory, we'll all be better off
Alan W, London,
I'm just glad I've got until 2011 to sort myself out a move to a fairer tax environment. Somewhere where the government doesn't tax you just for breathing. Somewhere where you get to keep a decent proportion of your hard earned income. Any cuts in final salary pensions for govt employees? No?
Delaney, London,
er... did robin hood steal from the tory voters and give to the labour voters then?
jem, london, uk
Why shouldn't a few wealthy people be taxed a bit more in an attempt to ease the global recession? I'd rather pay my extra £156 than risk the consequences of doing nothing.
James, Manchester, UK
The filthy rich have been living a life of excess and gluttony under Labour unchecked by fair taxes. So typical of Labour that now they need to raise more cash to compensate they are placing most of the burden on the middle income mules, allowing Peter Mandelson and the jet set to carry on partying.
Simon , London, UK
Labour has always been deeply jealous of the ~ £40K income group of the population. They want to reduce them to dust - but then Labour will get no revenue because we'll all be on "benefits".
CA, Manchester, UK
The U.K. is now heading for a Depression.
To raise NI and further tax the employed when unemployment
is shooting up is sheer madness.
PETER OAKLEY, duncan B.C. , Canada
This PBR is to help reduce the gap between the rich and poor. My pay has remained static in the past 3 years because of cheap immigrants, this budget will definitely help me. The rich in the past 5 years have become embarrassingly profligate, frankly £3,172/yr is peanuts for high income earners.
Ali, London,
Not much of an incentive to stay in Britain. Time to move to where taxes are lower and personal responsibility is not taxed. How many businesses will shut down or move away during the next year or so?
Dave, Phoenix, AZ, USA
No government in the world has a right to tax human subsistence, hence the personal allowance. Bad enough that the UK abolished personal allowances for children and spouses/partners. No allowance at all for single-income families is a crime.
K Becher, London,
What the middle and high earners have seen is the tip of the ice berg. Only after the election, will they and the rest see the rest of the iceberg. By then it will be too late.
The Gamble is too reckless to succeed and in the end the fault is ours to have placed our trust on this Government.
S Yogarajah, Harrow, UK
The country is in trouble now, and these measures are designed as a stopgap, a short term aid to the people. Why headline the negative effects that are to come into effect 2-3 years from now?
Stuart Dickson, Palma, Mallorca, Spain
Why complain,, We live in a I want it now society
VAT is is not something that is going to be claimed by Brussels,, we set our rate it is our rate alone,, ours is low by ECC standards,, now it is lower
Over half of the 12 Billion has already been accounted for from taxes on richer people
Nicholas Iles, Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom