Gary Duncan and Siobhan Kennedy
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Homeowners face further worry today as the Bank of England is set to resist calls for a cut in interest rates, despite a fall in house prices and mounting evidence of a sharp slowdown in the economy.
The Bank is expected to decide that rising inflation means that it must reject pleas for relief to shore up the economy and to help households struggling with soaring living costs.
The base rate is likely to be held at 5 per cent despite warnings yesterday from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that Britain faces a bleak two-year downturn with house prices continuing to plunge, consumer spending weakening, and growth failing to revive next year. House prices are expected to fall by “around 10 per cent”, the organisation said in its half-yearly outlook.
The OECD’s bleak assessment contradicts Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, who forecast that growth would recover next year. The OECD gave warning that a £31 billion black hole in the Government’s books could force Mr Darling to raise taxes or cut spending plans in coming years.
Appearing before the Treasury Select Committee yesterday, the Chancellor denied claims of financial irresponsibility over his decision to borrow £2.7 billion to raise tax allowances and compensate those hit by the abolition of the 10p rate. But he said: “If you’re saying should we have gone further and should we have gone faster, yes we should have.”
The OECD predicted that the economy would be hit hard in a property slump fuelled as high street banks keep home loans more costly and harder to come by. Existing loan conditions are expected to “remain tight” for would-be homebuyers and hundreds of thousands of people coming off cheap, fixed-rate mortgage deals, the OECD found. The blight on the housing market will take a toll of consumers’ spending, it added, dealing a sharp blow to the economy’s growth. However, the report added that it did see room for three quarter-point rate cuts in the first half of next year.
Yet the OECD backed the Bank’s expected “no change” verdict on interest rates. It said rising inflation fuelled by surging fuel and food prices meant that the Bank had little choice.
Growth in spending by consumers will drop by a third this year, to a lacklustre 1.9 per cent, and then crash to only 0.6 per cent next year, the think-tank predicted. With businesses also cutting back sharply, the OECD said Britain’s growth next year will sag to only 1.4 per cent, down from an already weak 1.8 per cent this year, and less than half of last year’s 3 per cent.
The prediction of protracted economic woe was the latest challenge to the Chancellor’s much more optimistic view that Britain will bounce back sharply next year, with growth rising from 1.75 per cent to between 2.25 and 2.75 per cent.
Fears that Britain is already sinking into a severe downturn were fuelled as a key survey showed that growth in the vast services sector stalled last month for the first time in more than five years. Worsening conditions were emphasised as services firms, from bars and restaurants to accountants and lawyers, cut jobs, with employment in the sector falling in May at its fastest for 12 years.
The think-tank also sounded an alert over the deteriorating state of the country’s finances. The Chancellor is in danger of breaking his own financial rules and substantial tax rises or spending curbs will be needed to escape this fate, it concluded.
Weakening growth was set to hit tax payments, sending government borrowing soaring by £31 billion more than Mr Darling has planned over the next two years, the OECD’s forecasts showed. The OECD predicted that public borrowing will surge from 3 per cent of national income (GDP) last year, to a hefty 3.8 per cent this year, against the Treasury’s 2.9 per cent prediction. That would add £13 billion extra to borrowing totals, lifting these to £56 billion in 2008-09.
The OECD expects that borrowing will remain stuck at 3.7 per cent of GDP next year, rather than falling to the 2.5 per cent that the Chancellor has forecast a gap equivalent to £18 billion of extra borrowing. It said that if Mr Darling was to meet his fiscal rules, “it is clear that much tighter fiscal policy will be required in the future if the rule is still to be respected”. That would spell either significant tax rises or more drastic curbs on the growth of government spending that the Chancellor has already laid out.
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Yawn. Yet more shock, horror. Growth of 1.5% is in no stretch of the imagination a 'severe downturn'. To prevent oil and food inflation affecting the whole of the economy it is correct to keep interest rates where they are. The failure of the 70s was to let oil inflation affect prices in general .
Eddie Reader, birmingham, england
Yes, I agree, raise interest rates now. I think the short term sharp pain will be less than the long term pain shoring up greedy property speculators. The price of property has to fall otherwise where will the first time buyers come from? Oh, I know, bigger salaries, in turn, higher infaltion!
Graham , Littlehampton,
Brian Anderson, Edinburgh, Scotland
Most inflation is indeed imported... but decreasing interest rates as you suggest will decrease the value of Sterling thus increase the price of imported goods further. The actions in US didn't really do anything to prevent 'apocolypse' in their housing market
Mark B, London,
Inflation is imported, food & fuel. The Bank's terms of reference are too narrow. We should follow the .US example and cut now to avoid apocalypse next year.
Brian Anderson, Edinburgh, Scotland
A 5o point rise is needed now, this will support sterling and send the right message to borrowers and lenders. It would be good to see the BoE stand up and act independently.
victor, London, UK
The first sentence of this article is misleading as firstly a cut in the base rate will make no difference to the Libor rate for borrowers and secondly most genuine homeowners would like a rate rise, the sooner the better, to protect the value of their earnings, savings and pensions.
Paul, Coventry,
The interset rates should be kept high or even increased to deter further borrowing. Some will suffer in the short term, but it will benefit us all in the long run.
Hamad Lone, London, England
If anything there is a good argument to raise interest rates to try to keep inflation under control. A crash is inevitable due to lack of controls by the government, the FSA, and pure human greed.
Harvey Taylor, Bangkok, Thailand
The BoE should be raising rates to protect the Sterling and fight inflation, not bail out greedy overstretched property speculators. Where were the rate rises when property was unsustainably inflating? An economy built on increasing debt accumulation is not as sound as Brown would have you believe.
Edward, London,