Elizabeth Colman
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
The Treasury has sought to compromise on a key plank of proposed measures in the Budget on March 21 to tighten income tax laws for contractors and freelancers.
It is understood that Gordon Brown has heard submissions from the financial and support services industries protesting that the proposed law could render “third parties” liable for contractors’ tax debts.
The legislation, unveiled in draft form last month, is meant to discourage use of “managed service companies”, a device to minimise tax. The laws permit Revenue & Customs from April 6 to recover from agencies or “end-point” employers any unpaid income tax where a freelancer or contractor uses a managed service company.
Managed service companies attract a lower rate of tax and are excluded from the requirement to pay national insurance.
The Times has learnt that the Treasury is looking to delay by up to six months the date from which the Revenue will enforce “third party” rules. This would give employers more time to ascertain contractors’ tax status.
Although the legislation is expected to stick to the Government’s policy of cracking down on freelancers who do not pay tax, it is understood that it will reflect a “pragmatic” approach.
The Association of Technology Staffing Companies told the Chancellor that the laws were “grossly unfair” and would cost the recruitment industry “millions of pounds”.
A submission by the accounting firm Ernst & Young (E&Y) proposes a delay in the start by six months from April 6 to October 6.
Chris Sanger, E&Y’s director of tax policy, said that the proposed rules on third parties were currently “an impractical solution that places [companies] in an impossible position”. It was hard for employers to tell a managed service company from other tax structures, he said.
However, the Treasury believes that many firms are aware that workers are using managed service companies and encourage the schemes.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If a person genuinely conducts his/her own business [and satisifes the 'government' criteria under IR35 determining that they are conducting business properly], why should they not group with others under a limited company to employ professionals to administer their affairs and also share admin. costs with others in a similar position? After all, this is what other business people do when employing accountants and lawyers.
Isn't this just another scheme from the government to raise more money in a 'not altogether legitimate or reasonable way'?
Len Brown, Beckenham, Kent