David Smith
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Every day, it seems, brings a new announcement of job losses from housebuilders. Totting up the numbers for the past week or so gives a figure not far short of 10,000, and this is not counting the thousands of self-employed sub-contractors who were building and fitting out new homes until the sector hit the buffers.
The job market is turning, though in a quieter way than it used to. Readers with long memories will recall the News at Ten job maps of the 1980s, when it was possible to pinpoint how many jobs were being cut and where. In a service-based economy, that is harder. People are quietly let go.
Even in Britain’s factories, where employment has dropped by an average of nearly 12,000 a month over the past decade, the process has been much less visible than it used to be.
This week we will get the official labour-market statistics, which will almost certainly show another rise in unemployment, though probably a modest one. The question is whether we are on the brink of something bigger.
There is another question, which is whether migrant workers will make the job-market adjustment in a sharply slowing economy easier or harder.
Ahead of this week’s figures, the most recent official numbers showed a 38,000 rise to 1.64m in the wider Labour Force Survey measure of unemployment over the February-April period.
The claimant count, still the more widely followed measure, rose by 9,000 to 819,300 in May and is up by 24,400 since its low point in January. The unemployment rate on this measure is 2.5%, bang in line with what economists have traditionally thought of as full employment.
That is important. In the recession of the early 1990s unemployment started rising from a high base, just under 1.6m, double its recent lows. This downturn starts from a position of low unemployment.
It also starts from a position of record employment, more than 29.5m, driven by the private sector. In the past two years, private-sector employment has risen by 632,000, while the number of public-sector jobs has dropped by 74,000.
So where do we go from here? Two sectors, housebuilding and financial services, are in the eye of the storm, though other parts of the economy are being affected by the slowdown. The Home Builders Federation (HBF) estimates that 300,000 people are directly employed in new housebuilding, which coincidentally is roughly the same as the number employed in the City and Canary Wharf.
How many of these are vulnerable? Probably a greater number in housebuilding, where activity has halved, than in the City. There will be collateral damage across the wider housing market among estate agents, surveyors and mortgage brokers. But a wider slowdown affects most sectors. When economic growth slows below around 0.6% a quarter, unemployment can be expected to rise. Growth in the quarter just ended is unofficially estimated at 0.2% and will continue at best at this rate over the next two or three quarters.
John Philpott, chief economist at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), with his finger on the pulse of the job market, reckons the slowdown will push the claimant count up by 200,000 or so over the next 18 months.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sure - so long as it is not your job thats going!
Glynn, Kingston,
Again, someone playing down the full tragedy of this economic mess. Here in the South West we are on the cusp of major job losses in the service sector. Like the 70s and 90s once more we are to become 'Costa del Dole'. Only difference this time is that it is both national & global.
Steve Marchant, Newton Abbot, UK
Britain does not "gear up,"it plays catch up.The poor always suffer the most,simple universal fact,unfortunately lots do not vote because they hate politicians.
The middle class are swing voters,so are licked by political candidates.You do not need to spend millions to find that out.
Shaun, Blackpool,
The effect on the economy of migrant workers returing home will be pretty much just as damaging as if they were still here and unemployed. Overall it means a large reduction in economic activity contributing towards recession.
Alex, Salisbury, UK
Good point on migrant workers! I have thought for long that in a downturn unemployment amongst UK staff would rise more as employers turned to lower paid and often more skilled and hungry foreign workers. Ten years from now this may not be such a problem, but in the near future it will be.
Chris Stuart, Carentan, France
The 'bloodbath' has already happened as the real productive economy has long been in decline. From a parochial local perspective I can name the closures of Massey Ferguson and Peugeot. Job losses now will be mainly among Polish construction workers, who will return home or look elsewhere in Europe.
Paul, Coventry,
"This downturn starts from a position of low unemployment"? Ten years ago there were 0.4 million on incapacity benefit. Today the figure is 1.4 and it is hard to believe that this is genuine. Thus the true claimant count is nearer 2.5 million, not far off the previous peak after a long recession.
George, Windsor,
Anyone who believes that recent immigrants are going to return once the job market fades is being naive. Those that claim unemployment and housing benefit wil do so!
Costas, Cyprus,
The claimant count is a poor indicator. For one thing, after 6 months benefit
becomes means-tested. This takes effect at a savings level of £3000, with nothing receivable
if you have £6000. These levels haven't changed for a very long time.
Many won't bother to claim it, or quickly become ineligible. It's more a measure of people
who are more or less on their uppers...not the number of people who don't have a job but want one,
or the number of people who don't have a job and don't want one, both of which are substantially
higher.
Living free from the state is not an easy thing to do. The numbers of people who one way or
another need public funds to live is enormous - probably more than half the population.
We have millions who are finding mere survival increasingly difficult. The social problem
that we face should not to be underestimated.
JM, London,