Patrick Hosking: Business Commentary
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
By nationalising Northern Rock, Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling are indirectly setting themselves up in one of the most reviled and thankless of occupations - as debt collectors.
And debt collectors, possibly, on an industrial scale, for, if the economic slowdown proves lengthy, demanding money - with or without menaces - from struggling Rock borrowers is the only way that the sums can stack up for the Exchequer and prevent taxpayers being left to pick up a hefty tab.
Even in the sunny economic conditions of a year ago, the Rock was repossessing homes at the rate of eight a day and writing off loans at the rate of £2 million a week. Assuming that it is applying the same enforcement criteria today, the seizure rate and writeoffs will be escalating in leaps and bounds as mortgage bills rise and house prices fall.
The Government should brace itself for being portrayed, on the one hand, as heartlessly throwing defaulting borrowers and their families on to the street, while, on the other, allowing some welchers to get off free at the expense of innocent taxpayers. It will be lambasted either way. To that extent, Mr Brown was right to argue that handing over the Rock to either of the private bidders would have been the softer option.
Indirectly, ministers will have to get used to the difficult business of chasing bad debtors, threatening them with legal action, taking them to court, making them bankrupt or negotiating repayment terms under individual voluntary arrangements. Every time that they forgive a debt, they lengthen the odds on taxpayers being one day repaid in full.
Of course, the business of debt collection will be done by proxy. Messrs Brown and Darling were emphasising yesterday that the Rock would be run at arm's length and on commercial grounds. But this is a fig leaf. The only shareholder is the Tripartite Authority and the Treasury ultimately calls the shots there.
Ron Sandler, chairman-elect, has already made plain that the business plan has to be approved by the Authority. Deciding how hard to chase debts ultimately comes down to ministers. So does weighing up how much to risk by writing new business or not selling off existing assets. Mr Darling's claim yesterday that the bank would have “commercial autonomy” is far from the whole truth.
Mr Brown could not even maintain the illusion of an independently managed Northern Rock for the duration of his press conference. Asked about job losses at the Rock, he said that he would do his best to keep them to a minimum. Mr Sandler's hands are tied from the start. Ministers call the shots and will be blamed for the casualties. The union Unite knows this. Its statement calling for no compulsory redundancies ended with the not-so-subtle postscript: “Unite is the largest single donor to the Labour Party.”
The problem is not so much the the mortgage book, though even here there may be bigger problems than envisaged so far. Every time that Mr Darling mentions this £87billion or so asset pile, he is careful to emphasise that, in the opinion of the Financial Services Authority, this is blue chip. If house prices continue to fall, that may be optimistic. The Rock was the most aggressive mortgage lender on the high street at the very period that house prices peaked last year. If any major lender is going to be hit by negative equity problems, it is the Rock.
The bigger problem is the Rock's collossal book of unsecured debt, which stood at £8billion in the last published figures. This is outstanding amounts of credit cards, personal loans, overdrafts and other borrowings where the Rock has very little comeback if borrowers get into difficulties. Writeoffs there would balloon if Britain entered a serious downturn.
Nationalisation raises questions about the treatment of expropriated shareholders and whether the Rock has an unfair advantage over rival banks. But these will pale into insignificance if the downturn intensifies and borrowers default in large numbers. That would really test the mettle of squeamish ministers.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If the company is worth 87 billion then why is the government spending over 100 billion to prop it up? Doesn't make sense to me.
Christopher Holland, Canberra, Australia
The government will not want the political embarassment of kicking people out of their homes, especially in Labour constituencies! the much more likely scenario is, that they (or appointed company most likely) will take ownership of properties of defaulters, but keep the occupants as tennants, thus they can then claim to have increased the social housing stock and take the pressure of Local councils to re-house people. The government can then claim that it still owns these "assets" so the tax payer hasn't lost out. It will be a load of baloney of course. It will be a very messy business either way, witht he taxpayer getting it big-time, whatever happens.
Paul W, London, UK
If, as Darling points out, the Rock has an asset pile of 87 billion and in the eyes of the FSA is blue chip then surely the shareholders of the company have a great case for 4 pounds a share!
Martin, Nottingham,