Patrick Hosking, Business commentary
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
George Osborne’s wheeze for tackling the nondom tax problem has the virtues of elegance and simplicity. The Shadow Chancellor wants to give UK residents who are nondomiciled for tax purposes a choice: pay a £25,000-a-year levy and keep your nondom perk, or pay nothing and opt to be treated like ordinary UK taxpayers.
The policy deserves a hearing. It begins to address the low-level gripe heard in a thousand bars that there is an elite of UK residents who are not quite paying their fair share of tax. Under the Tory plans, they would at least shell out a little bit more to the Exchequer on their overseas earnings.
It also recognises the legitimate worry that a clumsy crackdown would scare off people we can ill-afford to lose - rain-makers whose businesses sustain jobs, sports and arts stars whose talents really do add to the nation’s happiness, and plain big spenders who keep the tills jangling everywhere from Asprey’s and Jack Barclay to the Royal Opera House. A £25,000 demand is unlikely to send them scuttling off to Heathrow.
But the practical reality may be more irksome and less fruitful. Mr Osborne’s hope that £3.5 billion could be raised looks optimistic. Any nondom making less than £62,500 from nonUK earnings – and that must be many of them – would be better off sacrificing their nondom status. Many will do that and will not thank the Government for the extra red tape. Britain’s reputation as fiscally friendly to foreigners will inevitably dip a notch.
There is a good reason why Gordon Brown - and Tory Chancellors before him - kept returning the nondom issue to the “too difficult” basket.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As Alan Greenspan has recently pointed out, it's bad for capitalism when the idea takes hold that there is a super rich elite for whom the rule of thumb is that "only little people pay taxes". So it is clumsily perverse that the Tories didn't make more of the "social justice" aspects of this proposal, rather than presenting it as a way of paying for an inheritance tax break, itself easily portrayed as primarily in the interests of the rich
Gail, London, UK
'too difficult' because Labour relies on donations from non-doms to keep itself in funds, perhaps.
blagger, lechlade,
As Alan Greenspan has recently pointed out, it's bad for capitalism when the idea takes hold that there is a super rich elite for whom the rule of thumb is that "only little people pay taxes". So it is clumsily perverse that the Tories didn't make more of the "social justice" aspects of this proposal, rather than presenting it as a way of paying for an inheritance tax break, itself easily portrayed as primarily in the interests of the rich. Incidentally, if there are lots of non doms who benefit to the tune of less than 40 per cent of £62,500 - which I doubt - they will still be paying more tax when they opt back in. And for the super rich, who are the only ones whose departure might damage the economy, £25k is a rounding error which is probably a lot less than they are paying their accountants.
Gail Counsell, London, UK