Anatole Kaletsky: Economic View
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
Stock market prices around the world have been rising for the past four years almost without interruption. Recently the MSCI world index, the most comprehensive gauge of global share prices, has been hitting records almost daily – so much so that it is now 15 per cent higher than the record it hit in 2000 at the climax of the millennium internet boom and is up 134 per cent from the low point it reached on March 12, a week before the American-led bombing of Baghdad started. It was only last week, however, that the most widely followed American stock market index, the Standard & Poor’s 500, managed to break through its March 2000 high.
Considering that this 2000 record was rapidly followed by the biggest collapse in US share prices since 1929, it seems appropriate to ask whether investors who buy shares or other assets at today’s prices are setting themselves up for a similar disaster. And are other assets, such as London property, which are critically dependent on the prosperity of financial markets, similarly exposed?
The probable answer to both these questions is “no” – or, at least, not yet. This bull market will doubtless end in tears, as has every great stock market rally, but before that happens share prices are likely to go substantially higher. At present the conditions do not appear to exist for a severe setback, by which I mean a fall much more painful than the 5 to 10 per cent corrections that occur from time to time in every stock market move.
There is an obvious reason to disregard prophecies of a repeat of the dot-com debacle. It is that share prices are not really anywhere near as high as they were seven years ago. How can I say this when Wall Street has just exceeded its 2000 record? There are four simple arithmetical differences between conditions today and those that prevailed in the dot-com bubble.
While the S&P 500 is today slightly higher than it was in early 2000, there are three crucial differences between now and then. The first is simply that seven years have elapsed and in this period the value of US economic activity, as measured by gross domestic product, has grown by 41 per cent. Global economic activity, boosted by the spectacular growth of China and other emerging economies and flattered by the declining value of the dollar, has expanded by 60 per cent.
Moreover – and this is the second arithmetical difference – the rapid expansion of the world economy since March 2000 has been accompanied by a redistribution of global income in favour of profits. As a result, shares today are nowhere near as expensive as they were in 2000 in relation to the corporate earnings that they represent. In March 2000, the 500 shares in the S&P index were trading, on average, at 31 times their reported earnings. Today that ratio is only 18. Since this is almost exactly the average price-earnings ratio over the past 50 years (17.2), it is hard to argue that shares today are grossly overvalued in relation to profits. By contrast, in the internet boom any reasonable analysis of stock market prices showed that the S&P 500 was overvalued by about 70 per cent relative to the historic average, while most of the technology stocks that had powered that bull market were trading at anything from double to ten or more times their reasonable valuations.
This observation leads to a third obvious change since Wall Street was last this high. Seven years ago, the bull market was driven almost entirely by shares representing just three economic sectors – electronic technology, media and telecommunications. These so-called TMT stocks represented only about 10 per cent of the US economy and a far smaller share of the global economy, yet at the climax of the boom they comprised almost 50 per cent of global stock market values. Almost any reasonable economic analysis of competitive conditions in the TMT sectors suggested that most of these stocks would collapse. As I said repeatedly in this column eight years ago, many of these shares would not fall by just 30 or 50 per cent, but by 90 per cent or more. In the end, this collapse duly happened.
Today, conditions are very different. The bull market is not driven by one or two very overvalued sectors but is quite broadly based, with most industries generating good results. Although I believe that some of today’s most popular investments, such as heavy industry and commodity stocks, may be riding for a fall, it is hard to point to any companies that are remotely as overvalued as were the darlings of the TMT boom seven years ago.
A final difference is an even simpler matter of arithmetic. While the S&P 500 and the MSCI world index have hit new highs, most other stock market indices are still somewhat lower than they were seven years ago. London’s FTSE 100 is 4 per cent below its record of 6,930, Frankfurt’s DAX is 1 per cent off its peak and Tokyo’s Nikkei is 14 per cent below its 2000 high. How can the MSCI world index be hitting new highs daily, while most global stock markets are below their records? The answer is simple: the world index is measured in dollars. This means that a large part of its stratospheric ascent in the past five years has simply reflected the dollar’s decline.
If we compare the S&P 500 with the FTSE 100, it looks as if Wall Street has done 5 per cent better than London in the past seven years. But once we take account of the rise of sterling against the dollar, it turns out that British share prices have outperformed American investments by almost 30 per cent. So the new records hit last week by US share prices were not really records at all for international investors who measure their returns in euros, sterling or Swiss francs. For these investors, Wall Street is, in fact, almost 30 per cent cheaper than it was in 2000.
Putting these observations together points to a clear conclusion. In March 2000, when stock market prices on Wall Street were last at today’s levels, a crash was a mathematical certainty – as this column, along with many others, pointed out. Today one can say with almost equal confidence that the mathematical conditions simply do not exist for a stock market collapse.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
the short road from complacency to carnage
James McGee, bristol,
Few people liked Cassandra but she was right.
Claudio Zulli, Genoa, ITALY
In 2002, and I saw this happen, everybody pulled out of shares and put all their money into property. Now everybody is pulling out of property and investing in pension funds ...
Jo, Cambridgeshire, UK
I sold up a couple of weeks ago mainly because I believe that shares are generally grossly overvalued againt the general background.
In the UK in particular the fundamentals are getting badly out of kilter with a rapidly increasing balance of trade deficit and overblown lending levels particularly in relation to corporate private equity deals.
I'm also very concerned about the banks overstretching themselves and this latest RBS move to buy ABN is something I find deeply worrying in terms of the ability of a single bank to handle such a large level of expansion and the resultant debt.
Dick, Aberdeenshire,
This article is total nonsense. The US economy is on the brink of recession.
John, London, UK
You failed to answer your second question. What about other assets, especially London property, which is not valued in $US?
Gary Pasley, London,
But Math does not drive the mkt. Greed and fear are always at the wheel. The article so reminds me of the math offered before the DOT COM bubble went BANG! Keep your ear plugs handy.
Milton V, Ealing, , London UK
Good advice - time to sell up! One is reminded of Rothchild's comment on why he was a successful investor.
Mike, Sydney, Australia
Since when could the herds spell "affect"?
If maths had effected the herd mentality, cows would be stockmarket geniuses.
Freya, London,
there will be a collapse , and it will start in 10 months time.
rich, spain, spain
One of the key signs of a bubble about to burst is an avalanche of learned articles about how the bubble isn't about to burst.
MH, London, UK
So glad, I just love expert predictions and opinions because inevitably after the "Flood, Fire, Stock Market Crash or unexpected Hurricane in SE England", they are followed by the explanations of just why it was unexpectedly different, this time !
John Haynes, Burnham on Sea, UK
there is a credit bubble, and companies are becoming increasingly leveraged just as the economy is about to hit a housing led downturn. i wouldn't be so confident that share prices will continue their rapid ascent.
G, London,
since when did maths effect herd mentaliity ?
john doe, hull, uk
Yeah but the reality is, that it still exists, as in all bubbles (and this is one) burst, and this is by ALL accounts the biggest! When it happens & nobody can predict that, maybe another year or two who know's, but I predict with certainty it will. So I hold gold, and as my farther used to say 'you either get out early or too late'!
Ben Cowell, Moreton in Marsh,
"But once we take account of the rise of sterling against the dollar, it turns out that British share prices have outperformed American investments by almost 30 per cent. "
This is only true if UK listed share prices are converted to dollars at the start and end of the period, which would be appropriate for US investors in UK stocks.
Anyone investing in foreign equities is exposed to the effect of currency fluctuations on their returns, but I don't think this should be factored in when stating the performance of a particular stock market over time which is most fairly expressed in the local currency.
Tony Dunlop, Mid Devon, UK
"But once we take account of the rise of sterling against the dollar, it turns out that British share prices have outperformed American investments by almost 30 per cent. "
This is only true if UK listed share prices are converted to dollars at the start and end of the period, which would be appropriate for US investors in UK stocks.
Anyone investing in foreign equities is exposed to the effect of currency fluctuations on their returns, but I don't think this should be factored in when stating the performance of a particular stock market over time which is most fairly expressed in the local currency.
Tony Dunlop, Mid Devon, UK
I disagree that stocks markets are some distance from a crash.
Part of the rise in global stock markets is due to cheap money: a global glut of liquidity. Japan shares some of the blame for this liquidity through the yen carry trade. At some point the Bank of Japan will (hopefully this August ) raise interest rates from 0.5% to 1%. The yen will appreciate. As japanese interest rates are raised, yen carry traders will sell overseas assets to repay yen denominated loans. This will cause overseas markets to stumble. Further as the sale proceeds are repatriated to pay yen loans, this will cause the yen to appreciate even more. This in turn will have a domino effect. As the yen gets even stronger, more yen carry traders will dump overseas assets; looking to lock in profits and quickly repay yen loans. This will cause financial meltdown in global stockmarkets. Other investors will follow yen carry traders and also dump stocks - triggering a flight to quality assets.
John Fernandez, London, UK
I disagree that stocks markets are some distance from a crash.
Part of the rise in global stock markets is due to cheap money: a global glut of liquidity. Japan shares some of the blame for this liquidity through the yen carry trade. At some point the Bank of Japan will (hopefully this August ) raise interest rates from 0.5% to 1%. The yen will appreciate. As japanese interest rates are raised, yen carry traders will sell overseas assets to repay yen denominated loans. This will cause overseas markets to stumble. Further as the sale proceeds are repatriated to pay yen loans, this will cause the yen to appreciate even more. This in turn will have a domino effect. As the yen gets even stronger, more yen carry traders will dump overseas assets; looking to lock in profits and quickly repay yen loans. This will cause financial meltdown in global stockmarkets. Other investors will follow yen carry traders and also dump stocks - triggering a flight to quality assets.
John Fernandez, London, UK
When you start reading articles like this it is generally a good idea to sell as something unexpected appears and confounds the mathematical theories.
Simon , Chatham, Kent
I disagree that stocks markets are some distance from a crash.
Part of the rise in global stock markets is due to cheap money: a global glut of liquidity. Japan shares some of the blame for this liquidity through the yen carry trade. At some point the Bank of Japan will (hopefully this August ) raise interest rates from 0.5% to 1%. The yen will appreciate. As japanese interest rates are raised, yen carry traders will sell overseas assets to repay yen denominated loans. This will cause overseas markets to stumble. Further as the sale proceeds are repatriated to pay yen loans, this will cause the yen to appreciate even more. This in turn will have a domino effect. As the yen gets even stronger, more yen carry traders will dump overseas assets; looking to lock in profits and quickly repay yen loans. This will cause financial meltdown in global stockmarkets. Other investors will follow yen carry traders and also dump stocks - triggering a flight to quality assets.
John Fernandez, London, UK