Win VIP tickets
This assessment is a test of numerical reasoning. Using a numerical reasoning test enables employers to get a measure of how strong someone’s skills are in this area. If this is something that is key to the role in question, it helps them to understand who would be most suited to that role. Very often in this type of test the test taker is presented with a table, graph or similar and they are then asked questions about the information displayed. They require no prior knowledge of the subject matter which means they are therefore an efficient and objective way of gaining a better understanding of someone's level of reasoning in this area. Every question has a correct answer and test takers are generally advised to work quickly and accurately when completing them.
This test was developed by Talent Q in partnership with Times Online
Articles from our sister site WSJ.com:
You may be asked to subscribe to read certain articles
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
No, the answer is right. Take HK$/US$ in 2001 (as Garry says, 11.23/1.44 = 7.8). Then subtract from this HK$/US$ in 2006 (14.31/1.96 = 7.3). Take the difference and divide it by the original exchange rate (0.5/7.8), and you get 0.0641. The US$ has depreciated approx. 6% against the HK$.
Rachel, London,
Cheers Garry! On re-looking at the question I did the same calculation as you...their answer is still wrong then! Many thanks again.
Niki Cooper, Hong Kong,
Niki, in 2001 the US dollar would buy you 7.8 Hong Kong dollars (11.23/1.44). In 2006, it would only buy 7.3 (14.31/1.96), or 6.8% less - which I would say was closer to 7% myself.
Garry, Llantwit Major, Wales
Question 5 puzzles me, can someone please explain. I get the answer to be 6% stronger (+) but the stated correct answer is -6%. As I see it the US$ was 33% stronger in 2006 compared to 2001 and the HK$ was 27% stronger. Thus the US$ grew 6% more than the HK$ so it was stronger and thus +'ve. Help
Niki Cooper, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
"You are advised to use a calculator and rough paper for your calculations."
James, Leeds,
I found the numerical test difficult without calculator, paper or pencil and as a result I guessed most of them and gave up on the last one. Were we allowed these or not? It would be useful if you gave some indication.
Gina, Channel Islands , Guernsey